4.7 Article

Monolithic silica spin column extraction and simultaneous derivatization of amphetamines and 3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamines in human urine for gas chromatographic-mass spectrometric detection

期刊

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 661, 期 1, 页码 42-46

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2009.12.013

关键词

Monolithic spin column; Propyl chloroformate; Derivatization; Amphetamines; 3,4-Methylenedioxyamphetamines; Gas chromatograph-mass spectrometer

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [15922167]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15922167] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A simple, sensitive, and specific method with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry was developed for simultaneous extraction and derivatization of amphetamines (APs) and 3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamines (MDAs) in human urine by using a monolithic silica spin column. All the procedures, such as sample loading. washing, and elution were performed by centrifugation. APs and MDAs in urine were adsorbed on the monolithic silica and derivatized with propyl chloroformate in the column. Methamphetamine-d(5) was used as an internal standard. The linear ranges were 0.01-5.0 mu g mL(-1) for methamphetamine (MA) and 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) and 0.02-5.0 mu g mL(-1) for amphetamine (AP) and 3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA) (coefficient of correlation >= 0.995). The recovery of APs and MDAs in urine was 84-94%, and the relative standard deviation of the intra-and interday reproducibility for urine samples containing 0.1, 1.0, and 4.0 mu g mL(-1) of APs and MDAs ranged from 1.4% to 13.6%. The lowest detection limit (signal-to-noise ratio >= 3) in urine was 5 ng mL(-1) for MA and MDMA and 10 ng mL(-1) for AP and MDA. The proposed method can be used to perform simultaneous extraction and derivatization on spin columns that have been loaded with a small quantity of solvent by using centrifugation. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据