3.8 Article

Religiousness is positively associated with quality of life of ALS caregivers

期刊

AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS
卷 12, 期 3, 页码 168-171

出版社

INFORMA HEALTHCARE
DOI: 10.3109/17482968.2011.560947

关键词

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; religiousness; quality of life caregivers

资金

  1. Ricerca Sanitaria Finalizzata
  2. Regione Piemonte
  3. Progetti Alfieri
  4. Fondazione CRT, Torino, Italy
  5. Ministero della Salute (Progetti Finalizzati)
  6. Regione Piemonte (Progetti Finalizzati)
  7. Ministero dell'Universita e della Ricerca
  8. Universita di Torino
  9. Fondazione Vialli and Mauro for ALS Research
  10. ONLUS
  11. Federazione Italiana Giuoco Calcio
  12. Regione Piemonte (Ricerca Finalizzata)
  13. Fondazione CRT, Torino

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It has been repeatedly shown that religiousness and spirituality have positive effects on quality of life (QoL) and outcome in ALS patients. There are, however, very few data on the impact of religiousness/spirituality on ALS caregivers. We determined the impact of religiousness on caregivers and its correlation with quality of life, depression and anxiety. A total of 75 consecutive ALS patients and their informal caregivers were interviewed using tests evaluating religiousness, depression, anxiety, quality of life and satisfaction with life. Results showed that there was a significant correlation between patients and caregivers' public and total religiousness. Caregivers' private religiousness was related to their age and education level, while their public religiousness was related only to their education level. Caregivers' quality of life was related to their private religiousness and satisfaction with life with their total religiousness. We conclude that religiousness is positively associated with ALS caregivers' quality of life and satisfaction with life, in a measure similar to that observed in ALS patients. Health care professionals caring for ALS patients should consider that the needs of the caregivers include religious/spiritual concerns.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据