4.3 Article

The effect of curcumin on human islet amyloid polypeptide misfolding and toxicity

期刊

AMYLOID-JOURNAL OF PROTEIN FOLDING DISORDERS
卷 17, 期 3-4, 页码 118-128

出版社

INFORMA HEALTHCARE
DOI: 10.3109/13506129.2010.530008

关键词

h-IAPP; curcumin; type 2 diabetes mellitus; amyloid; protein misfolding; amyloid inhibitor; beta-cell

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [AG027936, DK59579]
  2. The Larry Hillblom Foundation
  3. Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale (FRM)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Type 2 diabetes involves aberrant misfolding of human islet amyloid polypeptide (h-IAPP) and resultant pancreatic amyloid deposits. Curcumin, a biphenolic small molecule, has offered potential benefits in other protein misfolding diseases, such as Alzheimer's disease. Our aim was to investigate whether curcumin alters h-IAPP misfolding and protects from cellular toxicity at physiologically relevant concentrations. The effect of curcumin on h-IAPP misfolding in vitro was investigated by electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy, ThT fluorescence and electron microscopy. Our in vitro studies revealed that curcumin significantly reduces h-IAPP fibril formation and aggregates formed in the presence of curcumin display alternative morphology and structure. We then tested a potential protective effect of curcumin against h-IAPP toxicity on beta-cells. Micromolar concentrations of curcumin partially protect INS cells from exogenous IAPP toxicity. This protective effect, however, is limited to a narrow concentration range, as curcumin becomes cytotoxic at micromolar concentrations. In different models of endogenous over-expression of h-IAPP (INS cells and h-IAPP transgenic rat islets), curcumin failed to protect beta-cells from h-IAPP-induced apoptosis. While curcumin has the ability to inhibit amyloid formation, the present data suggest that, without further modification, it is unlikely to be therapeutically useful in protection of beta-cells in type 2 diabetes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据