4.2 Article

Origin and genetic diversity of an introduced wall lizard population and its cryptic congener

期刊

AMPHIBIA-REPTILIA
卷 33, 期 1, 页码 129-140

出版社

BRILL
DOI: 10.1163/156853812X626160

关键词

bottleneck effect; effective population size; genetic variability; hybridization; invasive species; microsatellite; mtDNA

类别

资金

  1. 'Deutsche Bundesstiftung Umwelt' (DBU) [27282/33/2]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Common Wall Lizard (Podarcis muralis) has been introduced within large parts of Central Europe, the UK and parts of North America. In an introduced population of this species in Lower Saxony, Germany, we found in addition to mtDNA haplotypes of P. muralis also haplotypes of its congener Podarcis liolepis, a species that hitherto has never been recorded outside its native range. We therefore, (1) wanted to identify the geographic origin of the founder individuals of both non-native populations, (2) test for hybridization between introduced individuals of both species in Germany and (3) compare levels of genetic diversity between native and introduced populations. We sequenced a fragment of the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene and genotyped individuals of the introduced as well as native populations of both species at eleven microsatellite loci. Our results suggest that the founders presumably stem from a region in the eastern Pyrenees, where sympatric populations of P. muralis and P. liolepis are known. No evidence for gene flow between the two species was found in the introduced population. These results are consistent with behavioural observations indicating agonistic interactions of P. muralis towards P. liolepis rather than cross-species attraction. Compared to the native populations, high levels of genetic diversity have been retained in the introduced population of both species and no evidence for a genetic bottleneck was found. The effective population size was high in P. muralis, but substantially smaller in P. liolepis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据