4.4 Article

Improvement of enzymatic stability and intestinal permeability of deuterohemin-peptide conjugates by specific multi-site N-methylation

期刊

AMINO ACIDS
卷 43, 期 6, 页码 2431-2441

出版社

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00726-012-1322-y

关键词

DhHP-6; ROS; N-methylated peptide; Permeability; Enzymatic stability

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30901863, 20872048]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [20110491321]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The deuterohemin-peptide conjugate, DhHP-6 (Dh-beta-AHTVEK-NH2), is a microperoxidase mimetic, which has demonstrated substantial benefits in vivo as a scavenger of reactive oxygen species (ROS). In this study, specific multi-site N-methylated derivatives of DhHP-6 were designed and synthesized to improve metabolic stability and intestinal absorption, which are important factors for oral delivery of therapeutic peptides and proteins. The DhHP-6 derivatives were tested for (1) scavenging potential of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2); (2) permeability across Caco-2 cell monolayers and everted gut sacs; and (3) enzymatic stability in serum and intestinal homogenate. The results indicated that the activities of the DhHP-6 derivatives were not influenced by N-methylation, and that tri-N-methylation of DhHP-6 could significantly increase intestinal flux, resulting in a two- to threefold higher apparent permeability coefficient. In addition, molecules with N-methylation at selected sites (e.g., Glu residue) showed high resistance against proteolytic degradation in both diluted serum and intestinal preparation, with 50- to 140-fold higher half-life values. These findings suggest that the DhHP-6 derivatives with appropriate N-methylation could retain activity levels equivalent to that of the parent peptide, while showing enhanced intestinal permeability and stability against enzymatic degradation. The tri-N-methylated peptide Dh-beta-AH(Me)T(Me)V(Me)EK-NH2 derived from this study may be developed as a promising candidate for oral administration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据