4.4 Article

Acid-induced unfolding of didecameric keyhole limpet hemocyanin: detection and characterizations of decameric and tetrameric intermediate states

期刊

AMINO ACIDS
卷 39, 期 3, 页码 899-910

出版社

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00726-010-0524-4

关键词

Acidic pH; Decamer state; Dynamic light scattering; Keyhole limpet hemocyanin; Multimeric protein; Tetramer state

资金

  1. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, New Delhi

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) is widely used as an immune stimulant and hapten carrier derived from a marine mollusc Megathura crenulata. To provide details of the stability and equilibrium of KLH, different intermediate species were investigated with a series of biophysical techniques: circular dichroism, binding of hydrophobic dye, 1-anilino-8-naphthalene sulfonic acid, acrylamide-induced fluorescence quenching, thermal stability and dynamic light scattering. KLH in its native state at pH 7.4 exists in the stable didecameric form with hydrodynamic radii (R (h)) of 28.22 nm, which is approximately equal to a molecular mass of 8.8 +/- A 0.6 MDa. The experimental results demonstrated the presence of two structurally distinct species in the conformational transition of KLH under acidic conditions. One species populates at pH 2.8, characterized as decameric (4.8 +/- A 0.2 MDa; R (h) = 22.02 nm), molten globule-like state, while the other accumulates at pH 1.2 and is characterized as a tetramer (2.4 +/- A 0.8 MDa; R (h) = 16.47 nm) with more organized secondary and tertiary structures. Our experimental manipulation of the oligomeric states of KLH has provided data that correlate well with the known oligomeric forms obtained from total KLH formed in vivo and extends our understanding of multimer formation by KLH. The results are of particular interest in light of the important role of the mechanistic pathway of pH-dependent structural changes of Hc stability in the biochemical and medical applications of these respiratory proteins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据