4.4 Article

Consequences of Multiple Inflorescences and Clonality for Pollinator Behavior and Plant Mating

期刊

AMERICAN NATURALIST
卷 184, 期 5, 页码 580-592

出版社

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/678117

关键词

plant architecture; inflorescence; clonality; plant mating; bumble bee foraging; geitonogamy

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31121003]
  2. Beijing Higher Education Young Teacher Project [YETP0254]
  3. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Angiosperms engage in distributed reproduction, producing sex organs in multiple flowers on one or more inflorescences, including on different physical individuals of clonal plants. We investigated the effects of alternative deployments of artificial flowers for pollinator behavior and simulated pollen dispersal. Plants presented 18 flowers on either one inflorescence (1-I plants) or three inflorescences (3-I plants) spaced either closely or widely. Bees often skipped inflorescences on 3-I plants, visiting an average of 1.5 fewer flowers overall than on 1-I plants. In simulations with all flowers receiving and donating pollen, this behavior caused 7% less geitonogamy for 3-I plants, contradicting a common supposition that clonality increases geitonogamy. Bees generally moved upward within inflorescences and downward between inflorescences. Consequently, in simulations, segregation of pollen receipt to lower flowers and pollen donation to upper flowers reduced self-pollination and enhanced pollen export much more for 1-I plants. Nectar volume per flower had little relevant influence on bee behavior. The observed bee responses and simulated mating results suggest that production of multiple inflorescences and clonality promote pollination quality when flowers simultaneously receive and donate pollen, whereas a single large inflorescence is advantageous when segregation of sex roles among flowers reduces geitonogamy effectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据