4.4 Article

Asexual Fungal Symbionts Alter Reproductive Allocation and Herbivory over Time in Their Native Perennial Grass Hosts

期刊

AMERICAN NATURALIST
卷 173, 期 5, 页码 554-565

出版社

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/597376

关键词

defensive mutualist; endophyte; herbivores; life history; resource allocation; tolerance

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [DEB-0128343, 0613551]
  2. Division Of Environmental Biology
  3. Direct For Biological Sciences [0613551] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although most plants harbor microbial symbionts, the temporal effects of symbionts on resource allocation and herbivore resistance of perennial hosts are unknown. Neotyphodium endophytes are asexual, vertically transmitted fungal symbionts of grasses that are thought to interact mutualistically with their hosts, mainly by deterring herbivores. To test age-specific effects of Neotyphodium infection and herbivory on resource allocation, I conducted a 4-year field experiment with four genotypes of an infected perennial native grass from which the endophyte was removed and for which herbivory and water availability were controlled. In the absence of herbivory, infection increased allocation to reproductive effort in the first two growing seasons. Infected plants also flowered earlier. Herbivory increased allocation to reproduction in the first year but much more so in infected than in uninfected plants. Infected plants also had greater herbivore loads in early stages, suggesting that infected plants are more tolerant to herbivory. Asexual fungal symbionts thus fundamentally alter host resource allocation and resistance and tolerance to herbivores over time. Increased reproductive effort in early host ontogeny should benefit the symbiont by increasing transmission but perhaps at the expense of lifetime host fitness. If so, then the conventional notion of asexual endophytes as mutualistic hostages of their hosts is incorrect.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据