4.0 Article

The feeding behavior and diet of an endemic West Virginia land snail, Triodopsis platysayoides

期刊

AMERICAN MALACOLOGICAL BULLETIN
卷 26, 期 1-2, 页码 153-159

出版社

AMER MALACOLOGICAL SOC, INC
DOI: 10.4003/006.026.0215

关键词

Cheat threetooth; Cheat River Gorge

资金

  1. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
  2. West Virginia Division of Natural Resources
  3. Wildlife Diversity Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The feeding behavior and diet of the federally threatened land snail Triodopsis platysayoides (Brooks, 1933) are reported. The species is atypical among eastern North American land snails in that it remains active and feeding during hot, dry summer months while other land snail species occurring in the region may become motionless or are compelled to estivate. Triodopsis platysayoides has also coevolved with a rare mammal, the Alleghany wood-rat, Neotama magister. Clearly, where the wood-rat and T. platysayoides coexist, wood-rats furnish a nearly constant food supply to the snail, including wood-rat excrement and a host of wood-rat harvested provisions carried into the snail's location. Triodopsis platysayoides includes as part of its diet fungi, lichens, flower blossoms of the tulip tree Liriodendron tulipifera, deceased gray crave crickets Euhadenoecus fragilis, gray cave cricket excrement, yellow birch Betula allegheniensis, and sweet birch Betula lenta leaves. Senescent leaves of the birch may form a significant pool of foliar calcium available to the snail in an otherwise acidic environment. Triodopsis platysayoides was witnessed feeding on the vacant shells of Xolotrema denoatatum (Ferussac, 1821), Mesomphix cupreus (Rafinesque, 1831), and its own kind, presumably for the vacant shells of Xolotrema denotatum (Ferussac, 1821), bodily functions and shell building. Peak activity for the species occurred after nightfall whereas peak feeding occurred when temperatures were between 18 and 23 degrees C and relative humidity was between 70% and 85%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据