4.1 Article

Prevalence of antimicrobial resistance and association with toxin genes in Clostridium difficile in commercial swine

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF VETERINARY RESEARCH
卷 71, 期 10, 页码 1189-1194

出版社

AMER VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.71.10.1189

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Pork Board (NPB) [07-044]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective-To estimate prevalence and determine association between antimicrobial resistance and toxin gene profile of Clostridium difficile in commercial pigs at the preharvest food-safety level. Animals-68 sows and 251 young pigs from 5 farms in North Carolina and 3 in Ohio. Procedures-Fecal samples were collected from sows (8/farm) and matched young pigs (32/farm) at farrowing and again at the nursery and finishing stages. Clostridium difficile isolates were tested for susceptibility to 6 antimicrobials. A PCR assay was used to detect genes coding for enterotoxin A (tcdA), cytotoxin B (tcdB), and binary toxin (cdtB). Results-C difficile prevalence in young pigs at farrowing was 73% (n = 183) with significantly higher prevalence in Ohio (87.5%) than in North Carolina (64%). Clostridium difficile was isolated from 32 (47%) sows with no significant difference between the 2 regions. A single pig had a positive test result at the nursery, and no isolate was recovered at the finishing farms. Resistance to ciprofloxacin was predominant in young pigs (91.3% of isolates) and sows (94%). The antimicrobial resistance profile ciprofloxacin-erythromycin-tetracycline was detected in 21.4% and 11.7% of isolates from young pigs and sows, respectively. Most isolates had positive results for tcdA (65%), tcdB (84%), and the binary toxin cdtB (77%) genes. Erythromycin resistance and tetracycline resistance were significantly associated with toxin gene profiles. Conclusions and Clinical Relevance-The common occurrence of antimicrobial-resistant C difficile and the significant association of toxigenic strains with antimicrobial resistance could contribute to high morbidity in farms with farrowing pigs. (Am J Vet Res 2010;71:11891194)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据