4.7 Article

Vancomycin intermediate-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (VISA) Isolated from a patient who never received Vancomycin treatment

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2014.12.038

关键词

Vancomycin intermediated-resistant; Staphylococcus aureus; VISA; Molecular typing; Staphylococcus

资金

  1. Infectious Diseases Control Project from the Ministry of Health of China [2012ZX10004207-004]
  2. Hubei province Natural science funds [2013CFB172]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: With the abuse of antibiotics, the methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strain became prevalent. Furthermore, Staphylococcus aureus with a character of vancomycin intermediate-resistance (VISA) has been found globally since the first report in Japan. The main objectives of this study were to report a case of VISA isolated from a Chinese patient who had never undergone Vancomycin treatment, and to determine its molecular character. Methods: A total of 9 strains were recovered from a patient during the therapeutic process. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed to determine their antibiotic susceptibility patterns. To detect the VISA strain's molecular epidemiological features, growth and morphological characters, we used multilocus sequence typing, autolysis assay and transmission electric microscope tests. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) was performed to characterize the heterogeneities of all isolates. Results: One isolate was found to exhibit vancomycin intermediated-resistant with MIC of 8 mg/ml. It was ST239-T030-agr-1, had thickened cell wall, and displayed a slower growth rate and reduced susceptibility to Triton X-100-induced autolysis than other strains. All 9 strains exhibited the same PFGE pattern. Conclusion: This is the first report of VISA found in central China from a patient who had never received vancomycin treatment. (C) 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据