4.5 Article

Informed Consent in International Research: The Rationale for Different Approaches

期刊

出版社

AMER SOC TROP MED & HYGIENE
DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.2010.10-0014

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) [AI-074058, AI 21536, P50 AI 34969]
  2. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP)/World Bank/World Health Organization Special Programme [94-0622, 92-0751]
  3. Burroughs-Wellcome Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In developed countries, informed consent is based on the autonomy of the individual, a written description of the studies proposed, and previous experience of the participant with Western medicine. Consent is documented by the signature of the participant and supervised by institutional review boards (IRBs), which have conflicts of interest because they are also responsible for limiting institutional liability. In developing countries, the initial decision-making for informed consent is typically vested in the community rather than the individual, and illiteracy is common-limiting the value of written documents and signatures. The challenges in developing countries are exacerbated by the fact that persons at greatest risk of disease are often illiterate, have limited experience with Western medicine, and have limited understanding of the scientific rationale for the studies proposed. Given these differences, it is unrealistic to expect that consent strategies used in developed countries would be effective in such diverse settings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据