4.6 Article

Perivascular Stromal Cells as a Potential Reservoir of Human Cytomegalovirus

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION
卷 14, 期 4, 页码 820-830

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ajt.12642

关键词

Cytomegalovirus; HCMV; hematopoietic niche; pericytes; transplantation

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [NHLBI: HL97623]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) infection is an important cause of morbidity and mortality among both solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Identification of cells throughout the body that can potentially serve as a viral reservoir is essential to dissect mechanisms of cell tropism and latency and to develop novel therapies. Here, we tested and compared the permissivity of liver-, brain-, lung (LNG)- and bone marrow (BM)-derived perivascular mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) to HCMV infection and their ability to propagate and produce infectious virus. Perivascular MSC isolated from the different organs have in common the expression of CD146 and Stro-1. While all these cells were permissive to HCMV infection, the highest rate of HCMV infection was seen with LNG-MSC, as determined by viral copy number and production of viral particles by these cells. In addition, we showed that, although the supernatants from each of the HCMV-infected cultures contained infectious virus, the viral copy number and the quantity and timing of virus production varied among the various organ-specific MSC. Furthermore, using quantitative polymerase chain reaction, we were able to detect HCMV DNA in BM-MSC isolated from 7 out of 19 healthy, HCMV-seropositive adults, suggesting that BM-derived perivascular stromal cells may constitute an unrecognized natural HCMV reservoir. This study demonstrates that human CMV infects and propagates within bone marrow, liver, brain, and lung perivascular stromal cells, with the highest infection rate seen in lung cells, and suggests that perivascular bone marrow stromal cells may constitute an unrecognized natural CMV reservoir.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据