4.6 Article

A Novel Approach Inducing Transplant Tolerance by Activated Invariant Natural Killer T Cells With Costimulatory Blockade

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION
卷 14, 期 3, 页码 554-567

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ajt.12606

关键词

Costimulation blockade; invariant NKT; mixed chimerism; tolerance

资金

  1. Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Invariant natural killer T (iNKT) cells are one of the innate lymphocytes that regulate immunity, although it is still elusive how iNKT cells should be manipulated for transplant tolerance. Here, we describe the potential of a novel approach using a ligand for iNKT cells and suboptimal dosage of antibody for CD40-CD40 ligand (L) blockade as a powerful method for mixed chimerism establishment after allogenic bone marrow transplantation in sublethally irradiated fully allo recipients. Mixed-chimera mice accepted subsequent cardiac allografts in a donor-specific manner. High amounts of type 2 helper T cytokines were detected right after iNKT cell activation, while subsequent interferon-gamma production by NK cells was effectively inhibited by CD40/CD40L blockade. Tolerogenic components, such as CD11c(low)mPDCA1(+) plasmacytoid dendritic cells and activated regulatory T cells (Tregs) expressing CD103, KLRG-1 and PD-1, were subsequently augmented. Those activating Tregs seem to be required for the establishment of chimerism because depletion of the Tregs 1 day before allogenic cell transfer resulted in a chimerism brake. These results collectively suggest that our new protocol makes it possible to induce donor-specific tolerance by enhancement of the innate ability for immune tolerance in place of the conventional immunosuppression. This study establishes mixed hematopoietic chimerism with in vivo regulatory T cell expansion using combined liposomal alpha-galactosylceramide therapy and low dose CD40/CD154 blockade to control immune direction of invariant natural killer T cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据