4.6 Article

CTLA4Ig Prevents Alloantibody Formation Following Nonhuman Primate Islet Transplantation Using the CD40-Specific Antibody 3A8

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION
卷 12, 期 7, 页码 1918-1923

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04029.x

关键词

Alloantibodies; islet transplantation; nonhuman primate; immunosuppressive therapy

资金

  1. Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation [4-2005-1328]
  2. NIH [5U19-AI051731, 5R01-AI073707]
  3. Yerkes National Primate Research Center Base Grant [P51RR-000165]
  4. NHP Reagent Resource (NIAID) [HHSN272200900037C]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Islet transplantation to treat type 1 diabetes has been limited in part by toxicities of current immunosuppression and recipient humoral sensitization. Blockade of the CD28/CD80/86 and CD40/CD154 pathways has shown promise to remedy both these limitations, but translation has been hampered by difficulties in translating CD154-directed therapies. Prior CD40-directed regimens have led to prolonged islet survival, but fail to prevent humoral allosensitization. We therefore evaluated the addition of CTLA4Ig to a CD40 blockade-based regimen in nonhuman primate (NHP) alloislet transplantation. Diabetic rhesus macaques were transplanted allogeneic islets using the CD40-specific antibody 3A8, basiliximab induction, and sirolimus with or without CTLA4Ig maintenance therapy. Allograft survival was determined by fasting blood glucose levels and flow cytometric techniques were used to test for donor-specific antibody (DSA) formation. CTLA4Ig plus 3A8, basiliximab and sirolimus was well tolerated and induced long-term islet allograft survival. The addition of CTLA4Ig prevented DSA formation, but did not facilitate withdrawal of the 3A8-based regimen. Thus, CTLA4Ig combines with a CD40-specific regimen to prevent DSA formation in NHPs, and offers a potentially translatable calcineurin inhibitor-free protocol inclusive of a single investigational agent for use in clinical islet transplantation without relying upon CD154 blockade.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据