4.6 Article

Permanent CNI Treatment for Prevention of Renal Allograft Rejection in Sensitized Hosts Can Be Replaced by Regulatory T Cells

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION
卷 12, 期 9, 页码 2384-2394

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04143.x

关键词

T cell depleting mAb; calcineurin inhibitor; memory T cells; regulatory T cells; kidney transplantation

资金

  1. Else-Kroner-Fresenius-foundation, Germany [P14/06//A01/06]
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [DFG-SFB 650 TP Z2+ 14]
  3. Federal Ministry of Education and Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent data suggest that donor-specific memory T cells (Tmem) are an independent risk factor for rejection and poor graft function in patients and a major challenge for immunosuppression minimizing strategies. Many tolerance induction protocols successfully proven in small animal models e.g. costimulatory blockade, T cell depletion failed in patients. Consequently, there is a need for more predictive transplant models to evaluate novel promising strategies, such as adoptive transfer of regulatory T cells (Treg). We established a clinically more relevant, life-supporting rat kidney transplant model using a high responder (DA to LEW) recipients that received donor-specific CD4+/ 8+ GFP+ Tmem before transplantation to achieve similar pre-transplant frequencies of donor-specific Tmem as seen in many patients. T cell depletion alone induced long-term graft survival in naive recipients but could not prevent acute rejection in Tmem+ rats, like in patients. Only if T cell depletion was combined with permanent CNI-treatment, the intragraft inflammation, and acute/chronic allograft rejection could be controlled long-term. Remarkably, combining 10 days CNI treatment and adoptive transfer of Tregs (day 3) but not Treg alone also induced long-term graft survival and an intragraft tolerance profile (e.g. high TOAG-1) in Tmem+ rats. Our model allows evaluation of novel therapies under clinically relevant conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据