4.3 Article

The Effects of Multiple Doses of Rolofylline on the Single-Dose Pharmacokinetics of Midazolam in Healthy Subjects

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF THERAPEUTICS
卷 17, 期 1, 页码 53-60

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MJT.0b013e3181c12313

关键词

adenosine A1 receptor antagonist; drug-drug interactions; midazolam; pharmacokinetics; rolofylline

资金

  1. Merck Research Laboratories

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rolofylline is a potent, selective adenosine A1 receptor antagonist that was under development for the treatment of patients with acute decompensated heart failure and renal function impairment. This was a phase 1, randomized, open-label, 2-period, fixed-sequence study in 19 healthy adult volunteers to examine the effect of multiple intravenous rolofylline doses on the single-dose pharmacokinetics of midazolam, a sensitive CYP3A4 substrate. In period 1, subjects received a single oral dose of midazolam 7.5 mg on day 1. In period 2, subjects received 30 mg, 4-hour infusions of rolofylline (intended clinical dose and duration) once daily for 4 consecutive days; midazolam 7.5 mg was coadministered on day 4. The geometric mean ratios and 90% confidence intervals for AUC(0-infinity) and C-max of midazolam in the presence/absence of rolofylline were 1.20 (1.12-1.29) and 1.17 (1.03-1.32), respectively. The apparent terminal half-life (t(1/2)) for midazolam was similar in the presence/absence of rolofylline (4.31 and 4.27 hours, respectively). The geometric mean ratios (90% confidence intervals) for AUC(0-infinity) and C-max of 1'-hydroxymidazolam in the presence/absence of rolofylline were 1.04 (0.96-1.13) and 0.98 (0.84-1.14), respectively. The t(1/2) for 1'-hydroxymidazolam was slightly higher in the presence relative to absence of rolofylline (4.24 and 3.17 hours, respectively). Multiple doses of intravenous rolofylline 30 mg for 4 days were generally well tolerated and did not result in clinically important inhibition of CYP3A4 as indicated by little or no change in the pharmacokinetics of midazolam.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据