4.5 Article

Fatal Copper Deficiency From Excessive Use of Zinc-Based Denture Adhesive

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL SCIENCES
卷 340, 期 2, 页码 164-168

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1097/MAJ.0b013e3181e3648c

关键词

Zinc toxicity; Copper deficiency; Sensorimotor neuropathy; Myelodysplasia; Denture adhesive

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Human stores of zinc and copper exist in dynamic equilibrium; an increase in one causes a fall in the other, and clinical consequences of toxicity or deficiency of one or the other may result. Some of the most widely used denture adhesives are zinc based, creating a potential for zinc toxicity and corresponding copper deficiency. A case of denture adhesive-based zinc toxicity with corresponding copper deficiency leading to fatal ascending sensorimotor polyneuropathy was identified. The objectives of this study were to illustrate the evolution, and disparate response to treatment, of neurologic and hematologic abnormalities resulting from copper deficiency, and to discuss opportunities to mitigate denture adhesive-related zinc toxicity. Methods: Detailed clinical and laboratory data for the subject patient were compiled. The patient received copper supplementation. Copper and zinc levels were obtained posttreatment at varying intervals. Results: Hematologic and neurologic abnormalities progressed, as excessive use of zinc-based denture adhesive persisted. Hematologic and neurologic consultants were initially considered purely hematologic or neurologic diagnoses. Eventual consideration of unifying hypotheses led to definitive diagnosis 10 months after presentation. Hematologic abnormalities responded to copper supplementation, but neurologic abnormalities did not. The patient died of aspiration likely due to severe sensorimotor polyneuropathy. Conclusions: Early recognition of copper deficiency and improved warnings regarding excessive use of zinc-based denture adhesives may be the routes to improved outcomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据