4.5 Article

Elevated Serum Cobalamin in Patients With Decompensated Biventricular Failure

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL SCIENCES
卷 336, 期 5, 页码 383-388

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.MAJ.0000310651.34229.73

关键词

Heart failure; Liver; Veins

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Serum cobalamin (vitamin B-12), bound to transcobalamin 11, is taken up by the endothelium of the hepatic vasculature via a receptor-mediated membrane transport process. We hypothesized hepatic congestion is associated with elevated serum B-12 without hepatocyte necrosis. Methods and Results: Serum B-12, aspartate and alanine transaminases, alkaline phosphatase, bilirubin (Bili), and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) were monitored at the time of admission in 91 hospitalized patients: (a) 38 with decompensated biventricular failure having systemic venous distention, tricuspid regurgitation (TR), and echocardiographic evidence of inferior vena cava dilation and moderate to marked TR; (b) 18 with acute left heart failure having a myocardial infarction, an ischernic cardiomyopathy, or hypertensive heart disease; and (c) 35 without clinical evidence of failure despite myocardial infarction, pericarditis, or atrial arrhythmia. Serum cobalamin (normal 180-600 pg/mL) was elevated with biventricular failure (861.4 +/- 53.0 pg/mL) compared with (P < 0.0001) left heart or no failure, where B12 remained normal. Serum aspartate, alanine, and alkaline phosphatase were normal in each group whereas Bili was increased (1.8 +/- 0.2 mg/dL; P < 0.05) with biventricular failure. Plasma BNP was elevated in each group. Conclusions: Elevated cobalamin and Bili are respective biomarkers of hepatocellular dysfunction and cholestasis in patients having decompensated biventricular failure with systemic venous distention and TR without hepatocyte necrosis vis-a-vis left heart failure or in the absence of clinical failure. Elevated plasma BNP did not distinguish between the presence or absence of systemic venous congestion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据