4.6 Article

Oxidation of Z α1-Antitrypsin by Cigarette Smoke Induces Polymerization A Novel Mechanism of Early-Onset Emphysema

出版社

AMER THORACIC SOC
DOI: 10.1165/rcmb.2010-0328OC

关键词

SERPINA1; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; polymerization; oxidation; cigarette smoke

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The acceleration of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) by cigarette smoke (CS) in individuals with severe genetic deficiency of alpha(1)-antitrypsin (Z-AT [Glu342Lys]) exemplifies the critical importance of gene-environmental interactions to the development of COPD. We investigated the molecular basis for the interaction between Z-AT and CS. Female mice (8-10 wk old) transgenic for normal (M-AT) or Z-AT on CBA background were exposed to four 1R3F cigarettes daily for 5 days. Age and sex matched littermates not exposed to CS were used as controls. Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and lung homogenates were assessed for inflammatory cells, neutrophil elastase, and AT conformers. Z-AT was purified from plasma, exposed to CS extract, and assessed for the development and temporal relationship between AT conformers. Mice transgenic for Z-AT developed a significant increase in pulmonary polymers after acute CS exposure (P = 0.001). There were also increased neutrophils in CS-Z lungs versus controls (P < 0.001), which were tightly correlated with polymer concentrations (r(2) = 0.93). Oxidation of human plasma Z-AT by CS or N-chlorosuccinimide greatly accelerated polymerization (P = 0.004), which could be abrogated by antioxidants (P = 0.359 versus Z control). Our data show that CS accelerates polymerization of Z-AT by oxidative modification, which, in so doing, further reduces pulmonary defense and increases neutrophil influx into the lungs. These novel findings provide a molecular explanation for the striking observation of premature emphysema in ZZ homozygotes who smoke. Further work is required to assess whether antioxidant therapy may be beneficial in Z-AT-related COPD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据