4.6 Article

The Association Between Neighborhood Characteristics and Body Size and Physical Activity in the California Teachers Study Cohort

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
卷 102, 期 4, 页码 689-697

出版社

AMER PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOC INC
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300150

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Cancer Institute [R03 CA 128009, R01 CA77398, N01-PC-35136, N01-PC-35139, N02-PC-15105]
  2. California Breast Cancer Research Fund [97-10500]
  3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [U55/CCR921930-02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives. We considered interactions between physical activity and body mass index (BMI) and neighborhood factors. Methods. We used recursive partitioning to identify predictors of low recreational physical activity (<2.5 hours/week) and overweight and obesity (BMI >= 25.0 kg/m(2)) among 118 315 women in the California Teachers Study. Neighborhood characteristics were based on 2000 US Census data and Reference US business listings. Results. Low physical activity and being overweight or obese were associated with individual sociodemographic characteristics, including race/ethnicity and age. Among White women aged 36 to 75 years, living in neighborhoods with more household crowding was associated with a higher probability of low physical activity (54% vs 45% to 51%). In less crowded neighborhoods where more people worked outside the home, the existence of fewer neighborhood amenities was associated with a higher probability of low physical activity (51% vs 46%). Among non-African American middle-aged women, living in neighborhoods with a lower socioeconomic status was associated with a higher probability of being overweight or obese (46% to 59% vs 38% in high-socioeconomic status neighborhoods). Conclusions. Associations between physical activity, overweight and obesity, and the built environment varied by sociodemographic characteristics in this educated population. (Am J Public Health. 2012;102:689-697. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2011.300150)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据