4.6 Article

State-Level Moderation of Genetic Tendencies to Smoke

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
卷 99, 期 3, 页码 480-486

出版社

AMER PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOC INC
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.134932

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [K01 I D 50336]
  2. National Institutes of Health
  3. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development-funded University of Colorado Population Center [R21 HD 051146-01]
  4. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [P01-HD31921]
  5. 17 other agencies

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives. I examined genetic influences on smoking among adolescents and differences in the heritability of smoking across states in the United States. Methods. With data from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (participants aged 12-21 years), I used a multilevel twin- and sibling-pair (N=2060 pairs) regression model. Results. Daily smoking (hereditability estimate [h(2)] =0.54) and smoking onset (h(2) =0.42) were both highly heritable. Whereas the genetic influences on smoking onset were consistent across states, there was significant variation in these influences on daily smoking. Genetic influences on daily smoking were lower in states with relatively high taxes on cigarettes and in those with greater controls on the vending machines and cigarette advertising. Genetic influences were also negatively associated with rates of smoking among youths. Conclusions. At the state level, gene-environment interaction models are best characterized by the model of social control. State policies may influence genetic tendencies to smoke regularly, but they have not affected the genetic contributions to cigarette onset or experimentation. Future tobacco-control policies may emphasize the heritable endophenotypes that increase the likelihood that adolescents will initiate smoking. (Am J Public Health. 2009;99:480-486. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.134932)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据