4.6 Article

Lithium Treatment Moderate-Dose Use Study (LiTMUS) for Bipolar Disorder: A Randomized Comparative Effectiveness Trial of Optimized Personalized Treatment With and Without Lithium

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY
卷 170, 期 1, 页码 102-110

出版社

AMER PSYCHIATRIC PUBLISHING, INC
DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.12060751

关键词

-

资金

  1. American Drug Utilization Review
  2. American Professional Society of ADHD and Related Disorders
  3. American Psychiatric Association
  4. American Society for Clinical Psychopharmacology
  5. Appliance Computing (Mindsite)
  6. AstraZeneca
  7. Basliea
  8. Baystate Medical Center
  9. Belvoir Publishing
  10. Brain Cells
  11. Brandeis University
  12. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  13. Columbia University
  14. Corcept
  15. Dainippon Sumitomo
  16. Eli Lilly
  17. EpiQ
  18. Forest Pharmaceuticals, Hillside Hospital
  19. IMEDEX
  20. International Society for Bipolar Disorders
  21. Johnson Johnson
  22. MJ Consulting
  23. Medscape
  24. MBL Publishing, New York State
  25. NIMH
  26. Novartis
  27. PamLabs
  28. Pfizer
  29. PGx Health
  30. Physicians Postgraduate Press
  31. Ridge Diagnostics
  32. Schering-Plough
  33. SciMed
  34. ShireSUNY Buffalo
  35. Takeda/Lundbeck
  36. Targacept
  37. Teva Pharmaceuticals
  38. University of Texas Southwestern Dallas
  39. University of Wisconsin
  40. University of Pisa
  41. GlaxoSmithKline
  42. Wyeth
  43. Solvay
  44. Schering-Plough,
  45. Sanofi-Aventis
  46. Merck

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Lithium salts, once the mainstay of therapy for bipolar disorder, have tolerability issues at a higher dosage that often limit adherence. The authors investigated the comparative effectiveness of more tolerable dosages of lithium as part of optimized personalized treatment (OPT). Method: The authors randomly assigned 283 bipolar disorder outpatients to 6 months of open, flexible, moderate dosages of lithium plus OPT or to 6 months of OPT alone. The primary outcome measures were the Clinical Global Impression Scale for Bipolar Disorder-Severity (CGI-BP-S) and necessary clinical adjustments (medication adjustments per month). Secondary outcome measures included mood symptoms and functioning. The authors also assessed sustained remission (defined as a CGI-BPS score <= 2 for 2 months) and treatment with second-generation antipsychotics. The authors hypothesized that lithium plus OPT would result in greater clinical improvement and fewer necessary clinical adjustments. Results: The authors observed no statistically significant advantage of lithium plus OPT on CGI-BP-S scores, necessary clinical adjustments, or proportion with sustained remission. Both groups had similar outcomes across secondary clinical and functional measures. Fewer patients in the lithium-plus-OPT group received second-generation antipsychotics compared with the OPT-only group (48.3% and 62.5%, respectively). Conclusions: In this pragmatic comparative effectiveness study, a moderate but tolerated dosage of lithium plus OPT conferred no symptomatic advantage when compared with OPT alone, but the lithium-plus-OPT group had less exposure to second-generation antipsychotics. Only about one-quarter of patients in both groups achieved sustained remission of symptoms. These findings highlight the persistent and chronic nature of bipolar disorder as well as the magnitude of unmet needs in its treatment. (Am J Psychiatry 2013; 170:102-110)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据