4.7 Article

MHD flow and heat transfer behind a square cylinder in a duct under strong axial magnetic field

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2015.04.053

关键词

Square cylinder; MHD flow; Heat transfer; Axial magnetic field; Quasi two-dimensional model

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We capture through numerical simulation the MHD (magnetohydrodynamic) vortex dynamics around a square object in a square duct subjected to a strong externally imposed axial magnetic field. A quasi two-dimensional conditionality allows us to follow a two-dimensional modeling approach. The pertinent MHD control parameters such as the Reynolds and Hartmann numbers are kept in the range 0 < Re <= 6000 and 0 < Ha <= 2160, respectively. The various regimes of the MHD wake are found in-line with those obtained by Dousset and Potherat under similar conditions using a circular object (Dousset and Potherat, 2008). Four different regimes are identified out of which the first three regimes are the classical non-MHD 2D cylinder wakes. The transition from one to another regime is controlled by the friction parameter Re/Ha. The fourth regime is characterized by the vortices evolved from the duct side walls due to the boundary layer separation which strongly disturbs the Karman vortex street. In order to explore the thermal transport phenomena under the action of the axially imposed magnetic field, the channel bottom wall is considered heated while the top wall is maintained at the free stream temperature keeping the cylinder adiabatic. The heat transfer rate from the heated channel wall strongly depends on the imposed magnetic field strength as well as Reynolds number. Additionally, an enhancement in heat transfer is experienced by placing the square cylinder in the channel over the bare channel, however, simultaneously a degradation in heat transfer would occur if the square object is replaced by a same size circular object. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据