4.3 Article

Taxonomy of the Bornean Slow Loris, With New Species Nycticebus kayan (Primates, Lorisidae)

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PRIMATOLOGY
卷 75, 期 1, 页码 46-56

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ajp.22071

关键词

Nycticebus menagensis; Nycticebus bancanus; Nycticebus borneanus; cryptic species; morphology; sympatric; allopatric

类别

资金

  1. Systematics Research Fund of the Linnaean Society
  2. Primate Conservation Inc.
  3. International Animal Rescue Indonesia
  4. Royal Society
  5. Primate Society of Great Britain
  6. Primate Action Fund
  7. Margot Marsh Biodiversity Foundation
  8. SYNTHESYS Project (European Community Research Infrastructure Action, FP6 Structuring the European Research Area Programme) [NL-TAF-3491]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

More species of nocturnal primates are now recognized than in the past, because many are cryptic species. Subtle morphological disparities, such as pelage pattern and color variation, vocal cues, and genetics have aided in elucidating the number of diagnosable species in a genus. The slow lorises (genus Nycticebus) once included only two species, but recent taxonomic studies resulted in the description of three additional species; further incompletely explored variability characterizes each of the currently described species. The Bornean loris in particular is characterized by pelage and body size variation. In this study, we explored facemask variation in the Bornean loris (N. menagensis). Differing facemask patterns, particularly influenced by the amount of white on the face, significantly clustered together by geographic regions, separated by notable geographic boundaries. Our results support the recognition of four species of Bornean lorises: N. menagensis, N. bancanus, N. borneanus, and N. kayan. Genetic studies are required to support these findings and to refine further our understanding of the marked variability within the Bornean loris populations. Am. J. Primatol. 75:46-56, 2013. (c) 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据