4.3 Article

Factors Affecting Aggression Among Females in Captive Groups of Rhesus Macaques (Macaca mulatta)

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PRIMATOLOGY
卷 73, 期 11, 页码 1152-1159

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ajp.20982

关键词

aggression; dominance rank; ground substrate; colony management; welfare

类别

资金

  1. National Center for Research Resources (NCRR) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) [RR000169]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Captive groups of primates often exhibit higher rates of aggression than wild, free-ranging groups. It is important to determine which factors influence aggression in captivity because aggression, particularly intense aggression, can be harmful to animal health and well-being. In this study, we investigated the effect of ground substrate as well as season, rank, age, and group size on rates of agonistic interactions per female in seven captive groups of rhesus macaques (n=70 females, 1,723 focal samples) at the California National Primate Research Center. Agonistic interactions were divided into three categories: displacements, mild aggression, and intense aggression. Females living in enclosures with gravel substrate were 1.7 times more likely to be involved in intense aggression (e. g. chases and physical contact) than females living in enclosures with grass (Poisson regression model: P<0.001). High-ranking females were at least 1.3 times more likely to be involved in mild (e. g. threats and lunges) aggression than lower-ranking females (low rank: P=0.03; mid rank: P=0.001). Females of all ranks were 1.5-1.9 times more likely to be involved in both intense and mild aggression during the breeding season than other seasons. Age and group size did not affect rates of mild or intense aggression. These findings indicate that although some aggression appears to be natural and unavoidable, i.e. aggression during the breeding season, the well-being of captive macaques can be improved by developing grass substrate in outdoor enclosures. Am. J. Primatol. 73: 1152-1159, 2011. (C) 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据