4.3 Article

Expression regulation of Na+-K+-ATPase α1-subunit subtypes in zebrafish gill ionocytes

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.00029.2009

关键词

mitochondrion-rich cells; ion regulation; osmoregulation; fish

资金

  1. National Science Council and Academia Sinica, Taiwan, Republic of China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Liao BK, Chen RD, Hwang PP. Expression regulation of Na+-K+-ATPase alpha 1-subunit subtypes in zebrafish gill ionocytes. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 296: R1897-R1906, 2009. First published April 22, 2009; doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00029.2009.-In zebrafish (Danio rerio), six distinct Na+-K+-ATPase (NKA) alpha 1-subunit genes have been identified, and four of them, zatp1a1a.1, zatp1a1a.2, zatp1a1a.4, and zatp1a1a.5, are expressed in embryonic skin where different types of ionocytes appear. The present study attempted to test a hypothesis of whether these NKA alpha 1 paralogues are specifically expressed and function in respective ionocytes. Double fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis demonstrated the specific expression of zatp1a1a.1, zatp1a1a.2, and zatp1a1a.5 in NKA-rich (NaR) cells, Na+-Cl- cotransporter (NCC)-expressing cells, and H+-ATPase-rich (HR) cells, respectively, based on the colocalization of the three NKA alpha 1 genes with marker genes of the respective ionocytes (epithelial Ca2+ channel in NaR cells; NCC in NCC cells; and H+-ATPase and Na+/H+ exchanger 3b in HR cells). The mRNA expression (by real-time PCR) of zatp1a1a.1, zatp1a1a.2, and zatp1a1a.5 were, respectively, upregulated by low-Ca2+, low-Cl-, and low-Na+ freshwater, which had previously been reported to stimulate uptake functions of Ca2+, Cl- , and Na+. However, zatp1a1a.4 was not colocalized with any of the three types of ionocytes, nor did its mRNA respond to the ambient ions examined. Taken together, zATP1a1a.1, zATP1a1a.2, and zATP1a1a.5 may provide driving force for Na+-coupled cotransporter activity specifically in NaR, NCC, and HR cells, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据