4.5 Article

Loss of caveolin-1 and adiponectin induces severe inflammatory lung injury following LPS challenge through excessive oxidative/nitrative stress

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajplung.00182.2013

关键词

adiponectin; caveolin-1; inflammatory lung injury; LPS; oxidative/nitrative stress

资金

  1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [R01-HL-085462, R01-HL-085462-3S1, R56-HL-085462, P01-HL-077806]
  2. China Scholarship Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Excessive reactive oxygen/nitrogen species have been associated with the onset, progression, and outcome of sepsis, both in preclinical and clinical studies. However, the signaling pathways regulating oxidative/nitrative stress in the pathogenesis of sepsis-induced acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome are not fully understood. Employing the novel mouse model with genetic deletions of both caveolin-1 (Cav1) and adiponectin (ADPN) [double knockout (DKO) mice], we have demonstrated the critical role of Cav1 and ADPN signaling cross talk in regulating oxidative/nitrative stress and resulting inflammatory lung injury following LPS challenge. In contrast to the inhibited inflammatory lung injury in Cav1(-/-) mice, we observed severe lung inflammation and markedly increased lung vascular permeability in DKO mice in response to LPS challenge. Accordingly, the DKO mice exhibited an 80% mortality rate following a sublethal dose of LPS challenge. At basal state, loss of Cav1 and ADPN resulted in a drastic increase of oxidative stress and resultant nitrative stress in DKO lungs. Scavenging of superoxide by pretreating the DKO mice with MnTMPYP (a superoxide dismutase mimetic) restored the inflammatory responses to LPS challenge including reduced lung myeloperoxidase activity and vascular permeability. Thus oxidative/nitrative stress collectively modulated by Cav1 and ADPN signalings is a critical determinant of inflammatory lung injury in response to LPS challenge.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据