4.5 Article

Protein composition of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and airway surface liquid from newborn pigs

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajplung.00056.2013

关键词

proteomics; airway surface liquid; bronchoalveolar lavage; porcine lung

资金

  1. Cystic Fibrosis Foundation RDP
  2. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [P50 HL-61234, P01 HL-091842]
  3. Roy J. Carver Charitable Trust
  4. National Cancer Institute Cancer Center Support Grant
  5. Sandler Family Foundation
  6. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The airway mucosa and the alveolar surface form dynamic interfaces between the lung and the external environment. The epithelial cells lining these barriers elaborate a thin liquid layer containing secreted peptides and proteins that contribute to host defense and other functions. The goal of this study was to develop and apply methods to define the proteome of porcine lung lining liquid, in part, by leveraging the wealth of information in the Sus scrofa database of Ensembl gene, transcript, and protein model predictions. We developed an optimized workflow for detection of secreted proteins in porcine bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid and in methacholine-induced tracheal secretions [airway surface liquid (ASL)]. We detected 674 and 3,858 unique porcine-specific proteins in BAL and ASL, respectively. This proteome was composed of proteins representing a diverse range of molecular classes and biological processes, including host defense, molecular transport, cell communication, cytoskeletal, and metabolic functions. Specifically, we detected a significant number of secreted proteins with known or predicted roles in innate and adaptive immunity, microbial killing, or other aspects of host defense. In greatly expanding the known proteome of the lung lining fluid in the pig, this study provides a valuable resource for future studies using this important animal model of pulmonary physiology and disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据