4.5 Article

Secretory group V phospholipase A2 regulates acute lung injury and neutrophilic inflammation caused by LPS in mice

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajplung.90580.2008

关键词

airway inflammation; chemotaxis; pulmonary compliance

资金

  1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [HL-85779]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Munoz NM, Meliton AY, Meliton LN, Dudek SM, Leff AR. Secretory group V phospholipase A(2) regulates acute lung injury and neutrophilic inflammation caused by LPS in mice. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 296: L879-L887, 2009. First published March 13, 2009; doi: 10.1152/ajplung.90580.2008.-We investigated the regulatory role of 14-kDa secretory group V phospholipase A(2) (gVPLA(2)) in the development of acute lung injury (ALI) and neutrophilic inflammation (NI) caused by intratracheal administration of LPS. Experiments were conducted in gVPLA(2) knockout (pla2g5(-/-)) mice, which lack the gene, and gVPLA(2) wild-type littermate control (pla2g5(-/-)) mice. Indices of pulmonary injury were evaluated 24 h after intratracheal administration of LPS. Expression of gVPLA(2) in microsections of airways and mRNA content in lung homogenates were increased substantially in pla2g5(+/+) mice after LPS-administered compared with saline-treated pla2g5(-/-) mice. By contrast, expression of gVPLA(2) was neither localized in LPS-nor saline-treated pla2g5(+/+) mice. LPS also caused 1) reduced transthoracic static compliance, 2) lung edema, 3) neutrophilic infiltration, and 4) increased neutrophil myeloperoxidase activity in pla2g5(+/+) mice. These events were attenuated in pla2g5(-/-) mice exposed to LPS or in pla2g5(+/+) mice receiving MCL-3G1, a neutralizing MAb directed against gVPLA(2), before LPS administration. Our data demonstrate that gVPLA(2) is an inducible protein in pla2g5(+/+) mice but not in pla2g5(-/-) mice within 24 h after LPS treatment. Specific inhibition of gVPLA(2) with MCL-3G1 or gene-targeted mice lacking gVPLA(2) blocks ALI and attenuates NI caused by LPS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据