4.6 Article

Fluid shear stress modulates endothelial cell invasion into three-dimensional collagen matrices

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00281.2008

关键词

endothelium; angiogenesis; sphingosine-1-phosphate; three dimensions; sprout formation

资金

  1. American Heart [0730238N, 0530020N]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Kang H, Bayless KJ, Kaunas R. Fluid shear stress modulates endothelial cell invasion into three-dimensional collagen matrices. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 295: H2087-H2097, 2008. First published September 19, 2008; doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00281.2008.-Endothelial cells are subjected to biochemical and mechanical stimuli, which regulate their angiogenic potential. We determined the synergistic effects of sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) and fluid wall shear stress (WSS) on a previously established model of human umbilical vein endothelial cell invasion into three-dimensional collagen matrices. Collagen matrices were incorporated into a parallel-plate flow chamber to apply controlled WSS to the surface of endothelial monolayers over a period of 24 h. Cell invasion required the presence of S1P, with the effects of S1P being enhanced by shear stress to an extent comparable with S1P combined with angiogenic growth factor stimulation. The number of invading cells depended on the magnitude of shear stress, with a maximal induction at a shear stress of similar to 5 dyn/cm(2), whereas the invasion distance was proportional to the magnitude of shear stress. The enhancement of invasion by 5.3 dyn/cm(2) shear stress coincided with elevated phosphorylation of Akt and matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-2 activation. Furthermore, invasion induced by the combined application of WSS and S1P was attenuated by inhibitors of MMPs (GM6001) and the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt signaling pathway (wortmannin). These results provide evidence that shear stress is a positive modulator of S1P-induced endothelial cell invasion into collagen matrices through enhanced Akt and MMP-2 activation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据