4.6 Article

Alternative promoter and GATA5 transcripts in mouse

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpgi.00165.2009

关键词

differentiation; airway; gut; epithelium

资金

  1. NIH [AI-056352, HL-056399, HL-079398, HL-007605]
  2. Cancer Research Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chen B, Yates E, Huang Y, Kogut P, Ma L, Turner JR, Tao Y, Camoretti-Mercado B, Lang D, Svensson EC, Garcia JG, Gruber PJ, Morrisey EE, Solway J. Alternative promoter and GATA5 transcripts in mouse. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 297: G1214-G1222, 2009. First published September 24, 2009; doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00165.2009.-GATA5 is a member of the GATA zinc finger transcription factor family involved in tissue-specific transcriptional regulation during cell differentiation and embryogenesis. Previous reports indicate that null mutation of the zebrafish GATA5 gene results in embryonic lethality, whereas deletion of exon 1 from the mouse GATA5 gene causes only derangement of female urogenital development. Here, we have identified an alternate promoter within intron 1 of the mouse GATA5 gene that transcribes a 2.5-kb mRNA that lacks exon 1 entirely but includes 82 bp from intron 1 and all of exons 2-6. The alternative promoter was active during transient transfection in cultured airway myocytes and bronchial epithelial cells, and it drove reporter gene expression in gastric epithelial cells in transgenic mice. The 2.5-kb alternative transcript encodes an NH2-terminally truncated short GATA5 comprising aa 226-404 with a single zinc finger, which retains ability to transactivate the atrial natriuretic factor promoter (albeit less efficiently than full-length GATA5). Another new GATA5 transcript contains all of exons 1-5 and the 5' portion of exon 6 but lacks the terminal 1143 bp of the 3'-untranslated region from exon 6. These findings extend current understanding of the tissue distribution of GATA5 expression and suggests that GATA5 expression and function are more complex than previously appreciated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据