4.6 Article

Hepatic mitochondrial and ER stress induced by defective PPARα signaling in the pathogenesis of hepatic steatosis

期刊

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpendo.00438.2013

关键词

peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha; endoplasmic reticulum; mitochondrial and endoplasmic reticulum stress; apolipoprotein B; very-low density lipoprotein; hepatic steatosis

资金

  1. Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario
  2. Postdoctoral Research Fellowship from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
  3. CIHR Strategic Training Program in Protein Folding and Interaction Dynamics Studentship from the University of Toronto

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Emerging evidence demonstrates a close interplay between disturbances in mitochondrial function and ER homeostasis in the development of the metabolic syndrome. The present investigation sought to advance our understanding of the communication between mitochondrial dysfunction and ER stress in the onset of hepatic steatosis in male rodents with defective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha (PPAR alpha) signaling. Genetic depletion of PPAR alpha or perturbation of PPAR alpha signaling by high-fructose diet compromised the functional activity of metabolic enzymes involved in mitochondrial fatty acid alpha-oxidation and induced hepatic mitochondrial stress in rats and mice. Inhibition of PPAR alpha activity further enhanced the expression of apolipoprotein B (apoB) mRNA and protein, which was associated with reduced mRNA expression of the sarco/endoplasmic reticulum calcium ATPase (SERCA), the induction of hepatic ER stress, and hepatic steatosis. Restoration of PPAR alpha activity recovered the metabolic function of the mitochondria and ER, alleviated systemic hypertriglyceridemia, and improved hepatic steatosis. These findings unveil novel roles for PPAR alpha in mediating stress signals between hepatic subcellular stress-responding machinery and in the onset of hepatic steatosis under conditions of metabolic stress.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据