4.6 Article

Brown adipose tissue and its modulation by a mitochondria-targeted peptide in rat burn injury-induced hypermetabolism

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpendo.00098.2012

关键词

brown adipose tissue; burn injury-induced hypermetabolism; mitochondria dysfunction

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [2P50 GM-21700-27A, P30 DK-004056]
  2. Shriners Hospitals for Children [84050]
  3. Morningside Technology Advisory, Inc.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Yo K, Yu YM, Zhao G, Bonab AA, Aikawa N, Tompkins RG, Fischman AJ. Brown adipose tissue and its modulation by a mitochondria-targeted peptide in rat burn injury-induced hypermetabolism. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 304: E331-E341, 2013. First published November 20, 2012; doi:10.1152/ajpendo.00098.2012.-Hypermetabolism is a prominent feature of burn injury, and altered mitochondria function is presumed to contribute to this state. Recently, brown adipose tissue (BAT) was found to be present not only in rodents but also in humans, and its activity is associated with resting metabolic rate. In this report, we elucidate the relationship between burn injury-induced hypermetabolism and BAT activity and the possible role of the mitochondria-targeted peptide SS31 in attenuating burn injury-induced hypermetabolism by using a rat burn injury model. We demonstrate that burn injury induces morphological changes in interscapular BAT (iBAT). Burn injury was associated with iBAT activation, and this effect was positively correlated with increased energy expenditure. BAT activation was associated with augmentation of mitochondria biogenesis, and UCP1 expression in the isolated iBAT mitochondria. In addition, the mitochondria-targeted peptide SS31 attenuated burn injury-induced hypermetabolism, which was accompanied by suppression of UCP1 expression in isolated mitochondria. Our results suggest that BAT plays an important role in burn injury-induced hypermetabolism through its morphological changes and expression of UCP1.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据