4.6 Article

Characterization of a prospective human model for study of the reproductive hormone responses to major illness

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpendo.00472.2007

关键词

critical illness; testosterone; estrogen; cardiac surgery; gonadotropins

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With critical illness, serum testosterone levels fall markedly, whereas estrogen levels rise. Although animal studies suggest adaptive advantages, no prospective model has been available for studies in humans. We hypothesized that coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery would provide such a model by eliciting the same reproductive hormone and other endocrine responses as reported with major nonsurgical illnesses. We further hypothesized that those responses would occur consistently in all CABG patients with predictable time courses, providing reliable windows for prospective studies. In 17 men undergoing CABG, serum levels of reproductive hormones, cortisol, thyroid hormones, and IGF-I were measured before and for up to 5 wk after surgery. Changes in serum levels of reproductive and other hormones were similar to those reported in nonsurgical critically ill patients. Time course for onset, duration, and recovery of reproductive hormone changes were consistent among all patients. A window for studying the testosterone and estrogen responses was established as the first 5 days following CABG. Practical use of this model was demonstrated by evaluating, in another seven men, changes in gonadotroph responsiveness to GnRH following CABG. Finally, to determine whether our findings in CABG could be extended to other surgeries, we demonstrated similar endocrine responses in 12 men following abdominal aortic aneurysm resection. We conclude that patients undergoing CABG surgery provide a useful human model for the prospective evaluation of the reproductive axis responses to acute illness. Other major surgeries are likely to also be suitable for these studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据