4.5 Article

The Effect of Body Mass Index and Hip Abductor Brace Use on Inpatient Rehabilitation Outcomes After Total Hip Arthroplasty

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e318198b549

关键词

Inpatient Rehabilitation; Hip Replacement; Abductor Brace; Obesity; Body Mass Index; Physical Function

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To determine the effect of body mass index and hip abductor brace use on inpatient rehabilitation outcomes after total hip replacement. Design: This was a retrospective, comparative study of natural course of rehabilitation care in 15 inpatient rehabilitation facilities. Patients with total hip replacement (n = 1947) and inpatient rehabilitation were stratified into four body mass index groups: nonobese (body mass index <25 kg/m(2)), overweight (25-29.9 kg/m(2)), moderately obese (30-40 kg/m(2)), severely obese (body mass index >= 40 kg/m(2)), and further stratified by hip abductor brace (brace, no brace). The proportions of patients in each group who used hip abductor braces ranged from 14.5%-17.5%. The main outcomes were length of stay, functional independence measure scores, facility-related charges, and discharge destination. Results: Length of stay was 0.8-1.3 days longer in the body mass index <25 kg/m(2) group compared with the remaining body mass index groups (P < 0.05). Average, improvement in total and motor functional independence measure scores ranged 53%-58% and 74%-83% across groups (both P < 0.001). Total rehabilitation charges were highest in the <25 kg/m(2) body mass index group ($ 15,125 vs. $ 13,608-14,622; P < 0.0001). Hip brace use was associated with an average of $697 excess therapy/pharmacy charges during the rehabilitation stay, but no differences in other outcomes. Conclusions: Severe obesity and abductor brace use do not impair rehabilitation functional gains or discharge home, but is related with excess rehabilitation costs. Hip abduction braces do not seem necessary during rehabilitation, particularly for obese patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据