4.3 Article

Rensch's Rule, Bergmann's Effect and Adult Sexual Dimorphism in Wild Monogamous Owl Monkeys (Aotus azarai) of Argentina

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY
卷 146, 期 1, 页码 38-48

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.21541

关键词

Aotus; monogamy; Bergmann's rule; Rensch's rule; morphometrics; body mass; dentition

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [BCS-0621020]
  2. Wenner-Gren Foundation
  3. L.S.B. Leakey Foundation
  4. National Geographic Society
  5. Zoological Society of San Diego the University Research Foundation of the University of Pennsylvania

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Some monogamous primates are characterized by biparental care, territoriality, and a reduced level of physical dimorphism. In others, the relationship between those behavioral patterns and dimorphism is less clear. I tested Bergmann's and Rensch's rules using Aotus spp. body mass data and I characterized the extent of sexual dimorphism in body mass, dental and physical measurements in a socially monogamous owl monkey population (n = 91 adults) from the Argentinean Gran Chaco. A. azarai azarai from the Argentinean Chaco is larger than the more tropical owl monkey species (r = 0.7, N = 6 species), but there is no apparent increase in sexual dimorphism with increased body mass. The body masses of adult male and female A. a. azarai were remarkably similar (Mean = 1.26 kg); there were no marked sex differences in most skeletal measurements, but males had higher and wider upper and lower canines than did females. Body mass and neck circumference were positively and strongly related (r = 0.533, n = 52), and the body mass of adults was not a reliable indicator of their age (r =5 0.03, n = 10). The data illustrate the complexities inherent in examining and summarizing within population variation in skeletal and nonskeletal measurements and contribute to a better understanding of the relationships between monogamous behavioral patterns and sexual dimorphism. Am J Phys Anthropol 146:38-48, 2011. (C) 2011Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据