4.6 Article

Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor C Promotes Ovarian Carcinoma Progression through Paracrine and Autocrine Mechanisms

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
卷 184, 期 4, 页码 1050-1061

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2013.12.030

关键词

-

资金

  1. Italian Association for Cancer Research (AIRC) [IG 10424, 12182]
  2. AstraZeneca (Alderley Park, Macclesfield, UK)
  3. Italian Foundation for Cancer Research (FIRC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Vascular endothelial growth factor C (VEGFC) has been reported to promote tumor progression in several tumortypes, mainly through the stimulation of lymphangiogenesis and lymphatic metastasis. However, the expression and biological significance of the VEGFC/VEGF receptor (VEGFR)-3 pathway in ovarian cancer growth and dissemination are unclear, and have been investigated in this study. Soluble VEGFC was detected in the plasma and ascites of patients with ovarian carcinoma, and VEGFR3 expression was found in their tumor tissues. In human ovarian carcinoma xenograft models, high levels of soluble VEGFC in ascites and serum were detected, in association with disease progression, tumor burden, and volume of ascites. Peak VEGFC expression preceded para-aortic Lymph node infiltration by HOC8 neoplastic cells. Histological detection of tumor cells in blood and lymphatic vessels indicated both hematogenous and lymphatic dissemination. Overexpression of VEGFC in the VEGFR3-positive and luciferase-expressing IGROV1 cells promoted carcinoma dissemination after orthotopic transplantation in the ovary of immunodeficient mice. In vitro, VEGFC released by the tumor cells stimulated tumor cell migration in an autocrine manner. Cediranib, an inhibitor of VEGFR1-3 and c-kit, inhibited in vivo metastasis of VEGFC-overexpressing IGROV1 and in vitro autocrine effects. These findings suggest that the VEGFC/VEGFR3 pathway acts as an enhancer of ovarian cancer progression through autocrine and paracrine mechanisms, hence offering a potential target for therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据