4.6 Article

Primary Effusion Lymphoma Secretome Analysis Reveals Novel Candidate Biomarkers with Potential Pathogenetic Significance

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
卷 184, 期 3, 页码 618-630

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2013.11.028

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Health, Rome
  2. Progetto Integrato Oncologia Advanced Molecular Diagnostics project grant [RFPS-2006-2-342010.7]
  3. CRO Aviano National Cancer Institute for an intramural project Infectious Agents and Tumors

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Primary effusion lymphoma (PEL) is a rare B-cell neoplasm in which tumor cells are consistently infected by Kaposi's sarcoma associated herpesvirus and usually grow in body cavities without tumor mass formation. To detect new proteins related to pathogenesis, four established cell lines from PEL (CRO-AP2, CRO-AP3, CRO-AP5, and CRO-AP6) were characterized by proteomics analysis of the secretome. The secretomes were analyzed using two complementary mass spectrometry platforms: Liquid chromatography mass spectrometry and matrix-assisted Laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight based approaches. Among 266 proteins identified from the proteomics analysis, 139 were considered as predicted secreted. Twenty proteins were specifically secreted by PEL cell Lines after comparison with secretomes of human cell lines representative of diverse solid tumors and Leukemias. More important, 27 additional proteins were shared by all CRO-AP PEL cell lines. The presence of these proteins was confirmed by INC in CRO-AP cell Lines and in six other PEL cell lines, four PEL clinical samples, and three extracavitary Kaposi's sarcoma associated herpesvirus positive solid Lymphomas included for comparative analysis. Functional classification showed that PEL cell secretomes were enriched in proteins specifically involved in inflammation/immune response, growth/cell cycle, and mRNA processing, in addition to structural/matrix proteins and proteins with enzymatic activity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据