4.6 Article

Low-Dose-Rate, Low-Dose Irradiation Delays Neurodegeneration in a Model of Retinitis Pigmentosa

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
卷 180, 期 1, 页码 328-336

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.09.025

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture, Japan [17689045]
  2. Takeda Science Foundation
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [17689045] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The existence of radiation hormesis is controversial. Several stimulatory effects of low-dose (ID) radiation have been reported to date; however, the effects on neural tissue or neurodegeneration remain unknown. Here, we show that LD radiation has a neuroprotective effect in mouse models of retinitis pigmentosa, a hereditary, progressive neurodegenerative disease that leads to blindness. Various LD radiation doses were administered to the eyes in a retinal degeneration mouse model, and their pathological and physiological effects were analyzed. LD gamma radiation in a low-dose-rate (LDR) condition rescues photoreceptor cell apoptosis both morphologically and functionally. The greatest effect was observed in a condition using 650 mGy irradiation and a 26 mGy/minute dose rate. Multiple rounds of irradiation strengthened this neuroprotective effect. A characteristic up-regulation (563%) of antioxidative gene peroxiredoxin-2 (Prdx2) in the LDR-LD irradiated retina was observed compared to the sham-treated control retina. Silencing the Prdx2 using small-interfering RNA administration reduced the LDR-LD rescue effect on the photoreceptors. Our results demonstrate for the first time that LDR-LD irradiation has a biological effect in neural cells of living animals. The results support that radiation exhibits hormesis, and this effect may be applied as a novel therapeutic concept for retinitis pigmentosa and for other progressive neurodegenerative diseases regardless of the mechanism of degeneration involved. (Am J Pathol 2012, 180:328 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.09.025)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据