4.6 Article

Prevention of Age-Related Macular Degeneration-Like Retinopathy by Rapamycin in Rats

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
卷 181, 期 2, 页码 472-477

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2012.04.018

关键词

-

资金

  1. Russian Federal Agency for Science and Innovation [16.513.11.3107]
  2. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [11-04-00666]
  3. presidium of the Russian Academy of Science [21.13]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Age-related macular degeneration, a neurodegenerative and vascular retinal disease, is the most common cause of blindness in the Western countries. Evidence accumulates that target of rapamycin is involved in aging and age-related diseases, including neurodegeneration. The target of rapamycin inhibitor, rapamycin, suppresses the senescent cell phenotype and extends life span in diverse species, including mice. Rapamycin decreases senescence-associated phenotypes in retinal pigment epithelial cells in culture. Herein, we investigated the effect of rapamycin on spontaneous retinopathy in senescence-accelerated OXYS rats, an animal model of age-related macular degeneration. Rats were treated with either 0.1 or 0.5 mg/kg rapamycin, which was given orally as a food mixture. In a dose-dependent manner, rapamycin decreased the incidence and severity of retinopathy. Rapamycin improved some (but not all) histological abnormalities associated with retinopathy. Thus, in retinal pigment epithelial cell layers, rapamycin decreased nuclei heterogeneity and normalized intervals between nuclei. In photoreceptor cells, associated neurons, and radial glial cells, rapamycin prevented nuclear and cellular pyknosis. More important, rapamycin prevented destruction of ganglionar neurons in the retina. Rapamycin did not exert any adverse effects on the retina in control disease-free Wistar rats. Taken together, our data suggest the therapeutic potential of rapamycin for treatment and prevention of retinopathy. (Am J Pathol 2012, 181:472-477; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpath.2012.04.018)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据