4.6 Article

Tumor Endothelial Cells Acquire Drug Resistance by MDR1 Up-Regulation via VEGF Signaling in Tumor Microenvironment

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
卷 180, 期 3, 页码 1283-1293

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.11.029

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Science, and Culture of Japan [20390506, 21659458]
  2. Akiyama Foundation
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [21659458, 20390506, 23792306, 23390457, 23659930] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tumor endothelial cells (TECs) are therapeutic targets in anti-angiogenic therapy. Contrary to the traditional assumption, TECs can be genetically abnormal and might also acquire drug resistance. In this study, mouse TECs and normal ECs were isolated to investigate the drug resistance of TECs and the mechanism by which it is acquired. TECs were more resistant to paclitaxel with the up-regulation of multidrug resistance (MDR) 1 mRNA, which encodes the P-glycoprotein, compared with normal ECs. Normal human microvascular ECs were cultured in tumor-conditioned medium (CM) and became more resisting to paclitixel through MDRI mRNA up-regulation and nuclear translocation of Y-box-binding protein 1, which is an MDR1 transcription factor. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor 2 (VEGFR2) and Akt were activated in human microvascular ECs by tumor CM. We observed that tumor CM contained a significantly high level of VEGF. A VEGFR kinase inhibitor, Ki8751, and a phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-Akt inhibitor, LY294002, blocked tumor CM-induced MDR1 up-regulation. MDR1 up-regulation, via the VEGF-VEGFR pathway in the tumor microenvironment, is one of the mechanisms of drug resistance acquired by TECs. We observed that VEGF secreted from tumors up-regulated MDR1 through the activation of VEGFR2 and Akt. This process is a novel mechanism of the acquisition of drug resistance by TECs in the tumor microenvironment (Am J Pathol 2012, 180: 1283-1293; DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.11.029)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据