4.6 Article

Identification and Characterization of Cartilage Oligomeric Matrix Protein as a Novel Pathogenic Factor in Keloids

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
卷 179, 期 4, 页码 1951-1960

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.06.034

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology, Japan [22791720]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23592647, 22791720] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To elucidate pathogenic molecules in keloids, microarray analysis was performed using RNAs extracted from keloid-derived fibroblasts and normal skin-derived fibroblasts from the same patient with a typical keloid. Among 11 up-regulated extracellular matrix genes, cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP) was most prominently increased. Up-regulation of COMP mRNA and protein was confirmed in the keloid tissue by quantitative RT-PCR and Western blot. Using immunohistochemistry, we compared 15 keloids and 6 control normal tissues using a COMP-specific antibody and found that COMP stained positively in 10 keloids (66.7%), whereas no staining was observed in normal tissues, demonstrating the ectopic expression of COMP in keloids. Comparing keloids smaller or larger than 10 cm(2), the larger keloids were significantly more intensely stained with the COMP-specific antibody. Because COMP reportedly accelerates collagen type I fibril assembly, we examined whether extracellular type I collagen deposition is altered by silencing COMP mRNA by small interfering RNA (siRNA). Immunocytochemistry showed at 96 hours after transfection with COMP siRNA that the extracellular deposition of type I collagen was decreased compared to that observed with control siRNA. Further, COMP knockdown decreased amount collagens type I to V in the medium and on the cell surfaces. Our data suggest that COMP facilitates keloid formation by accelerating collagen deposition, thus providing a new therapeutic target. (Am J Patbol 2011, 179:1051-1060; DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.06.034)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据