4.6 Article

Fibroid tumors are not a risk factor for adverse outcomes in twin pregnancies

期刊

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.10.879

关键词

fibroid tumor; preterm birth; twin pregnancy

资金

  1. NICHD [5 T32 HD055172-02]
  2. Washington University CTSA [UL1 RR024992]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE: Uterine fibroid tumors have been associated with adverse outcomes in singleton pregnancies. We aimed to estimate risk for adverse obstetric outcomes that are associated with fibroid tumors in twin pregnancies. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study of twin pregnancies with >1 fibroid tumor on second trimester ultrasound examination. Outcomes included small-for-gestational-age fetal growth, preterm delivery, preterm rupture of membranes, abruption, preeclampsia, and intrauterine fetal death. Univariable and multivariable analyses were used to evaluate the impact of fibroid tumors on outcomes in twin pregnancies compared with twin pregnancies without fibroid tumors. RESULTS: Of 2378 nonanomalous twin pregnancies, 2.3% had fibroid tumors. Twin pregnancies with fibroid tumors were no more likely to have small-for-gestational-age growth (40.0% vs 36.0%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.1; 95% confidence interval, 0.7-2.0) or preterm delivery at <34 weeks' gestation (25.0% vs 24.0%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.0; 95% confidence interval, 0.5-1.9) than twin pregnancies without fibroid tumors. Other adverse outcomes were no more likely to occur in twin pregnancies with fibroid tumors than in twin pregnancies without fibroid tumors. Post hoc power calculations suggested >97% power to detect 2-fold differences in small for gestational age and preterm delivery at <34 weeks' gestation. CONCLUSION: In contrast to data that suggest an increased risk for adverse outcomes in singleton pregnancies with fibroid tumors, twin pregnancies with fibroid tumors do not appear to be at increased risk for complications compared with those pregnancies without fibroid tumors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据