4.6 Article

Impact of maternal immunization on influenza hospitalizations in infants

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY
卷 204, 期 6, 页码 S141-S148

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.02.042

关键词

infants; influenza hospitalization; influenza vaccine; maternal vaccination; vaccine effectiveness

资金

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [U01/IP000017, U01/IP000022, U01/IP000147]
  2. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [K23 AI065805]
  3. Wachovia Research Fund
  4. Medimmune for respiratory syncytial virus studies
  5. Medimmune
  6. Wyeth
  7. Novartis
  8. Sanofi-Pasteur
  9. CSL
  10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  11. Association of Maternal and Child Health Programs

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We sought to determine whether maternal vaccination during pregnancy was associated with a reduced risk of laboratory-confirmed influenza hospitalizations in infants <6 months old. Active population-based, laboratory-confirmed influenza surveillance was conducted in children hospitalized with fever and/or respiratory symptoms in 3 US counties from November through April during the 2002 through 2009 influenza seasons. The exposure, influenza vaccination during pregnancy, and the outcome, positive/negative influenza testing among their hospitalized infants, were compared using logistic regression analyses. Among 1510 hospitalized infants <6 months old, 151 (10%) had laboratory-confirmed influenza and 294 (19%) mothers reported receiving influenza vaccine during pregnancy. Eighteen (12%) mothers of influenza-positive infants and 276 (20%) mothers of influenza-negative infants were vaccinated (unadjusted odds ratio, 0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.32-0.88 and adjusted odds ratio, 0.52; 95% confidence interval, 0.30-0.91). Infants of vaccinated mothers were 45-48% less likely to have influenza hospitalizations than infants of unvaccinated mothers. Our results support the current influenza vaccination recommendation for pregnant women.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据