4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

The molecular basis for sonographic cervical shortening at term: identification of differentially expressed genes and the epithelial-mesenchymal transition as a function of cervical length

期刊

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.06.076

关键词

bone morphogenetic protein 7 (BMP-7); cervical length; cervical ripening; claudin-1; endometrial progesterone-induced protein (EPIP); epithelial-mesenchymal transition; extracellular matrix; high-dimensional biology; preterm birth; progesterone; PSAT1; tight junction; transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta); uterine cervix

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether cervical shortening of a ripe cervix at term is associated with changes in the cervical transcriptome. STUDY DESIGN: Sonographically measured cervical lengths and biopsy specimens were obtained from 19 women at term who were not in labor with a ripe cervix. Affymetrix HG-U133 Plus 2.0 arrays (Affymetrix Inc, Santa Clara, CA) were used. Gene expression was analyzed as a function of cervical length. Gene Ontology, pathway analyses, quantitative real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, and immunohistochemistry were performed. RESULTS: Cervical length shortening was associated with differential expression of 687 genes. Fifty-four biologic processes, 22 molecular functions, and 9 pathways were enriched. Quantitative real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction analysis confirmed differential expression of 13 genes. Bone morphogenetic protein-7, claudin-1, integrin beta-6, and endometrial progesterone-induced protein messenger RNA, and protein expressions were down-regulated with cervical shortening. CONCLUSION: Sonographic cervical shortening in patients at term who are not in labor with a ripe cervix is associated with changes in the uterine cervix transcriptome. The epithelial-mesenchymal transition may participate in the mechanism of cervical shortening at term.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据