4.6 Article

Modulation of fetal inflammatory response on exposure to lipopolysaccharide by chorioamnion, lung, or gut in sheep

期刊

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.07.058

关键词

antigen exposure; chorioamnionitis; fetal inflammation; innate immunity; maturation

资金

  1. National Institute of Health [HL-08 70711, HL-65397, HD-12714, HD-57869]
  2. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia
  3. Women and Infants' Research Foundation, Western Australia
  4. Dutch Scientific Research Organization
  5. Research School Oncology and Developmental Biology, University of Maastricht
  6. EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT [R01HD057869] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  7. EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH &HUMAN DEVELOPMENT [R01HD012714] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  8. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [K08HL070711, R01HL065397] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that fetal lipopolysaccharide exposures to the chorioamnion, lung, or gut would induce distinct systemic inflammatory responses. STUDY DESIGN: Groups of 5-7 time-mated ewes were used to surgically isolate the fetal respiratory and the gastrointestinal systems from the amniotic compartment. Outcomes were assessed at 124 days gestational age, 2 days and 7 days after lipopolysaccharide (10 mg, Escherichia coli 055:B5) or saline solution infusions into the fetal airways or amniotic fluid. RESULTS: Lipopolysaccharide induced systemic inflammatory changes in all groups in the blood, lung, liver, and thymic lymphocytes. Changes in lymphocytes in the posterior mediastinal lymph node draining lung and gut, occurred only after direct contact of lipopolysaccharide with the fetal lung or gut. CONCLUSION: Fetal systemic inflammatory responses occurred after chorioamnion, lung, or gut exposures to lipopolysaccharide. The organ responses differed based on route of the fetal exposure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据