4.5 Article

Classification of Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations and Intranidal Flow Patterns by Color-Encoded 4D-Hybrid-MRA

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY
卷 34, 期 1, 页码 46-53

出版社

AMER SOC NEURORADIOLOGY
DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3204

关键词

-

资金

  1. German Research Fund (DFG)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: 4D MRA has been evolving as a noninvasive supplement for DSA. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of a newly developed blood flow visualization technique for the classification of cerebral AVMs. We hypothesized that 4D-hMRA allows detection of different flow patterns within the nidus as well as differentiation of feeders and draining veins and has very good agreement with DSA regarding the Spetzler-Martin grade. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-one consecutive patients with AVMs were evaluated by using 4D-hMRA and DSA by 2 blinded raters. Rating criteria included Spetzler-Martin score and other morphologic variables together with a new scale for 3 intranidal flow patterns (homogeneous = 1, unidirectional = 2, heterogeneous = 3). RESULTS: The Spetzler-Martin grades were rated different from DSA in 5 cases by rater 1 and in 3 cases by rater 2 with an excellent interrater reliability of kappa = 0.96 (4/31, 1 by size and 3 by drainage). Each reader missed 5 feeders on 4D-hMRA. Draining veins were distinguished in the temporal course in 7 on DSA but in 8 and 12 on 4D-hybrid-MRA (raters 1 and 2 respectively), with kappa = 0.79. A type 1 intranidal flow pattern was recognizable in 9 (30%) patients; type 2, in 19 (60%); and type 3, in 3 (10%). CONCLUSIONS: 4D-hMRA allows reliable Spetzler-Martin grading and detection of brain arteriovenous malformation feeding arteries and draining veins, with the drawback that for small vessels DSA is still needed. Draining veins might even be detected with higher sensitivity than on DSA. Discrimination of different intranidal flow patterns is possible, but their relevance for hemorrhage risk assessment and therapy planning requires further study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据