4.5 Article

Putaminal Hyperintensity on T1-Weighted MR Imaging in Patients with the Parkinson Variant of Multiple System Atrophy

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY
卷 30, 期 4, 页码 689-692

出版社

AMER SOC NEURORADIOLOGY
DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1443

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: A hyperintense putaminal rim, putaminal hypointensity, and putaminal atrophy on T2-weighted MR images are findings suggestive of parkirsonian-dominant multiple system atrophy (MSA-P). However, putaminal hyperintensity on T1-weighted images, which has not been discussed in previous reports, is also frequently observed in patients with MSA-P. Here, we investigated whether putaminal hyperintensity oil T1-weighted images is helpful to diagnose MSA-P. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with MSA-P (n = 17), Parkinson disease (PD, n = 37) and progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP, n = 11), and healthy control subjects (n = 16) were enrolled in this study. Two examiners, who were blind to the diagnoses, independently rated the putaminal hyperintensity on T1-weighted images (T1H), hyperintense putaminal rim oil T2-weighted images (T2H), putaminal hypointensity on T2-weighted images (T2 L), and putaminal atrophy by using a visual analog scale, and performed a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. The area under the curve (AUC; minimum, 0.5; maximum, 1.0) was automatically calculated as a positive parameter, indicating its usefulness to differentiate between diseases. RESULTS: For differentiating patients with MSA-P from healthy control Subjects, AUC values were 0.983 for T1H, 0.923 for T2H, 0.726 for T2 L, and 0.967 for putaminal atrophy. Between MSA-P and PD, the respective AUC values were 0.990, 0.921, 0.739, and 0.923; and between I and PSP, the respective AUC values were 0.984, 0,923, 0.727, and 0.967. CONCLUSIONS: All putaminal findings except T2 L were useful for the diagnosis of MSA-P. T1H was superior to T2H to differentiate MSA-P from other diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据