4.6 Article

Prospective Multicenter Study Evaluating Fecal Calprotectin in Adult Acute Bacterial Diarrhea

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
卷 121, 期 12, 页码 1099-1106

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.06.034

关键词

Diarrhea; Fecal calprotectin; Fecal lactoferrin; Fecal occult blood test (FOBT); Hemoccult test; Intestinal infection; Stool culture

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Every year, about 2.2 million deaths occur worldwide due to diarrhea. Reliable diagnosis of patients with acute infectious diarrhea remains a formidable challenge to the clinicians. This is the first study reporting use of fecal calprotectin in diagnosing acute diarrhea. The aim was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of fecal calprotectin, fecal lactoferrin, and guaiac-based fecal occult blood test in a diverse group of consecutive patients with acute diarrhea in which routine bacterial stool cultures and cytotoxins for Clostridium difficile were performed. METHODS: This was a prospective case-control multicenter study from January 2004 until October 2007 in 2383 consecutive patients with acute diarrhea. They provided stool samples for performing cultures. Patients with positive cultures and an equal number of matched controls with negative cultures underwent fecal occult blood test and calprotectin and lactoferrin assays. RESULTS: Calprotectin, lactoferrin, and fecal occult blood tests demonstrated sensitivity and specificity of 83% and 87%, 78% and 54%, and 38% and 85%, respectively, for diagnosing acute bacterial diarrhea. CONCLUSIONS: Calprotectin showed high correlation with bacteriologically positive infectious diarrhea compared with lactoferrin and fecal occult blood test. It may potentially revolutionize management algorithm for patients with acute diarrhea. As a screening test, calprotectin can generate results within hours to support presumptive diagnosis of infectious diarrhea, which can decide suitability of stool samples for culture. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. . The American Journal of Medicine (2008) 121, 1099-1106

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据